The flurry of picketing and protests sweeping across major cities of the United States, and the equally vehement flurry of verbal responses coming from over-paid and under-brained Republican talk radio pundits, has me wondering who is really protesting?
The discussion arose at company happy hour the other night – would you take part in the protests? The general consensus was “sure … if I didn’t have a job I needed to be at”. The fact of the matter is that the luxurious misfortune of having time to protest Wall Street, and all that is evil in America and elsewhere in the world, means one of three things: you’re either unemployed (not by choice), so wealthy you don’t need to work, or you’re wholly irresponsible and are reneging on your actual responsibilities, in order to jump on the hipster bandwagon. I’m ignoring the fourth group of people outright – students who don’t understand what it means to have a job, be paying off debt (versus accruing it), and so forth, because as anyone knows who has survived the college experience, reality doesn’t kick in until some time after you graduate.
If we think about the productive man hours alone that have been lost to the Wall Street protests we could probably have cleared the country’s beaches of trash, taught some underprivileged children how to read, and had time to take a shower in between. Instead there are vast swaths of lemmings camped out in downtowns across the country, enjoying media coverage and the mild amusement of bored police officers as they are forced to “monitor” the situation.
The most ironic part of the whole operation? We walked by our local homeless resident the other night, as we normally do on our dog walk, and exchanged the usual pleasantries. I alluded to the “surround sound” emanating from the protests a few blocks away, and asked how he was enjoying this publicly provided sound track. His response? “The damn protesters kept me up all night. I couldn’t get a minute of sleep.” The 99% protesters should remember that they, too, are privileged.
